AlcoHawk Pro: Professional Edition Digital Alcohol Detector
|
List Price: Our Price: $93.58 You Save: $66.37 (41%) Availability: Usually ships in 3-4 business days Buy 3rd Party: from $78.00 (click here) Category: Health Care See more product details |
|---|
Product Reviews of AlcoHawk Pro: Professional Edition Digital Alcohol Detector
Product Review: A must if you drink alcohol
Summary: 5 Stars
I bought this product because it was used on me by a police officer. I passed (thank god) but didn't realize how close I was to the legal limit. That second glass of wine with dinner can sneak up on you. It comes with a handy 12 volt power source. Now I always check my BAC before driving no matter how safe I feel.Product Review: ALCOHAWK WORKS
Summary: 5 Stars
This is my 3rd from this company in 5 years, I wish they would sell a calibration kit so I can verify it is still accurate before the pooolice.
It claims to work for 350 +/- uses and looses accuracy. But for less than a speeding ticket is is well worth the price.
Product Review: Accurate
Summary: 5 Stars
I have a breathalyzer installed in my car so I got this one to test myself before blowing into the one installed in my car. I have found it to be very easy to use and very accurate. I actually have a friend who is a policeman and he tested this device in comparison to his police breathalyzer and they were exactly the same. I definately recommend this product.Product Review: AlcoHawk Pro breathalyzer
Summary: 5 Stars
I purchased the AlcoHawk Pro Breathalyzer from Amazon.com after searching the internet for the best breatalyzer. This one is the most recent and best available one on the market, even in use by some policemen. At Amazon.com I found it at about half price of what the other websites sold it for. It is brand new and works wonderfully. I will continue to buy from Amazon.com for best value on many items!
Cindy
Product Review: AlcoHawk Pro works
Summary: 4 Stars
I have used it a few times. I have nothing to compare it to, nothing to use as a baseline to see if it indeed gives me the correct readout, but I would ESTIMATE it works as it should.